The Nigerian authorities 3 times ignored requests from United Nations teams concerning the therapy of Nnamdi Kanu, the chief of the indigenous individuals of Biafra (IPOB), the ban on IPOB and “discrimination and violence towards members of the Igbo minority”.
The United Nations on Tuesday launched paperwork displaying its “pressing appeals” to the Nigerian and Kenyan governments to answer allegations of “unlawful arrest and extradition” of Nnamdi Kanu.
Within the August 26 UN paperwork SaharaReporters obtained, the UN known as on the Nigerian and Kenyan governments to supply particulars of how Kanu was arrested and illegally delivered to Nigeria.
The UN paperwork state that the “pressing appeals” had been made in “our capability as Particular Rapporteur on Torture and Different Merciless, Inhuman or Degrading Therapy or Punishment”; Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; Working Group on Pressured or Involuntary Disappearances; Particular Rapporteur on the proper of everybody to the best attainable bodily and psychological well being; Particular Rapporteur on Minority Points and Particular Rapporteur on the Promotion and Safety of Human Rights and Elementary Freedoms in Counter-Terrorism in accordance with Human Rights Council Resolutions ”.
The United Nations working teams had warned within the paperwork that the letters to the Nigerian and Kenyan governments and any response from the nations could be printed inside two months.
“This discover and any response from Your Excellency Authorities can be posted via the Discover Website inside 60 days. They may then even be made obtainable within the regular report for submission to the Human Rights Council, ”the paperwork say.
Nevertheless, SaharaReporters realized on Tuesday, October 26, precisely 60 days after the letter was despatched to the Nigerian authorities, that the regime led by Muhammadu Buhari had not but responded to the UN’s calls for within the paperwork.
As a part of their inquiries, the UN teams had requested for “detailed details about the present state of well being of Mr. Kanu and the measures taken or deliberate to stop irreparable injury to his life and private integrity and to make sure that he has entry to the medicines and the medical therapy his state of well being requires ”.
Different inquiries embrace “detailed details about the circumstances by which Mr. Kanu was forcibly detained earlier than being handed over to the Nigerian authorities and transferred from Nairobi to Abuja. Please additionally make clear any worldwide cooperation measures which will have taken place in reference to the arrest and switch of Mr Kanu and, previous to his arrest, current any worldwide arrest warrant which will have been issued towards him.
“Please present particulars of the factual and authorized causes for Mr. Kanu’s arrest and detention, in addition to the formal expenses towards him and the authorized provisions beneath which he was charged.”
However Aloy Ejimakor, particular counsel for the IPOB chief, advised SaharaReporters that the “Nigerian authorities didn’t reply to the inquiries,” regardless of the Buhari regime confirming receipt of the doc on September 17, 2021.
The letter from the Nigerian authorities learn partly: “The Everlasting Mission of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to the Workplace of the United Nations and different worldwide organizations in Geneva compliments the Workplace of the Excessive Commissioner for Human Rights (Division for Particular Procedures) and has the respect to verify the Receipt of a joint pressing attraction from Particular Procedures Ref UA NGA 5/2021 on the twenty sixth and mistreatment of Mr. Nnamdi Kanu.
“The Everlasting Mission wish to announce that the joint pressing attraction has been forwarded to their headquarters to take the mandatory motion and any response could be despatched instantly upon receipt.”
In a letter to the Overseas Minister, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention of the United Nations Fee on Human Rights (UNCHR) additionally accused the Nigerian authorities of ignoring two earlier communications from the group.
She accused the Nigerian authorities of ignoring its communications about banning IPOB and treating Igbo individuals.
“Of their communication with the reference to AL NGA 5/2020, representatives of particular proceedings have already expressed considerations in regards to the outlawing of the IPOB as a terrorist group in accordance with the 2013 amended model of the Terrorism Act. As well as, its communication associated to UA NGA 4/2017 raised considerations about discrimination and violence towards members of the Igbo minority.
“We remorse the dearth of replies from Your Excellency’s Authorities to each communications. Mr Kanu’s case was beforehand referred to the Nigerian Authorities by the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances and resolved in 2017, “the group stated.
The Nigerian authorities introduced in June the arrest and extradition of Kanu from Kenya to proceed to be tried in Nigeria.
In response to IPOB’s longstanding marketing campaign for the unbiased Republic of Biafra, he’s being tried in a courtroom verging on treason.
The IPOB chief was launched on bail on well being grounds in April 2017, however later fled the nation when his residence in Abia state was attacked by the navy.