WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court docket on Wednesday placed on maintain a decrease court docket order that may have permitted curbside voting in Alabama in November.
The justices’ vote was 5-3, with the court docket’s three liberals dissenting. As is typical when the Supreme Court docket acts on an emergency foundation, the justices within the majority didn’t clarify their determination. It was not clear what number of counties may need provided curbside voting, permitting folks to vote from their automotive by handing their poll to a ballot employee.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissent joined by Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Elena Kagan, described the decrease court docket’s order permitting curbside voting in November as “modest,” and he or she mentioned she wouldn’t have put it on maintain.
“It doesn’t require all counties to undertake curbside voting; it merely provides ready counties the choice to take action. This treatment respects each the proper of voters with disabilities to vote safely and the State’s curiosity in orderly elections,” she mentioned, noting that 28 states allow curbside voting.
The choice stemmed from a lawsuit the NAACP Authorized Protection and Academic Fund, the Southern Poverty Regulation Heart and the Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program filed on behalf of voters with well being points who have been involved in regards to the danger of COVID-19 on the polls.
The state’s Republican lawyer basic and secretary of state sought to dam a decrease court docket’s ruling within the case that may have let counties supply curbside voting. Attorneys for the state argued that since Alabama doesn’t have a regulation expressly allowing curbside voting, that it shouldn’t be allowed.